Advocates emphasize benefits of new broadband initiative / public news service for health justice

Groups that promote responsible technology deployment are celebrating the Biden administration’s new $ 42.5 billion broadband, access and deployment program because it prefers fiber-optic technology to broadband communications technologies such as cable, satellite, DSL and wireless.

Gary Bolton, president and CEO of the Fiber Broadband Association, said fiber-optic connections are faster, more reliable and can be easily adapted to future technological advances.

“You will be able to do things like smart grid upgrades, public safety and even modern services like 5G,” Bolton said. “So having this almost unlimited capacity will really eliminate the digital divide once and for all.

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration aims to ensure that all communities, including low-income rural areas, have high-speed broadband access so that they do not lag behind in the digital economy.

Funding for the implementation of broadband access comes from the Two-Party Infrastructure Act.

Doug Wood, president and founder of Americans for Responsible Technology, said health groups prefer broadband to wireless because wireless cell towers emit radio frequency radiation. A 2018 study from the National Institutes of Health linked radiofrequency to cancer in laboratory animals.

“We are beginning to understand that there are biological impacts, even at levels far below what the government considers safe,” Wood said. “So it seems like an unwise decision to start installing wireless antennas and wireless broadband and communities across the country.”

Proponents of wireless technology say their products are safe. In its blog, wireless company Ceragon claims that fixed wireless solutions are reliable, have a higher bandwidth, and are faster and cheaper to deploy and maintain.

you get more stories like this by email

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.